Verification of Automata with Storage Mechanisms

An important question in computer science is to ask, whether a given system conforms to a specification. Often this question is equivalent to ask whether a finite automaton with certain memory like a stack or queue can reach some given state. In this thesis we focus this reachability problem of automata having one or more lossy or reliable stacks or queues as their memory. Unfortunately, the reachability problem is undecidable or of high complexity in most of these cases. We circumvent this by several approximation methods. So we extend the exploration algorithm by Boigelot and Godefroid under-approximating the reachability problem of queue automata. We also study some automata having multiple stacks with a restricted behavior. These “asynchronous pushdown systems” have an efficiently decidable reachability problem. To show our results we first have to gain knowledge of several algebraic properties of the so-called transformation monoid of the studied storage mechanisms.An important research topic in computer science is the verification, i.e., the analysis of systems towards their correctness. This analysis consists of two parts: first we have to formalize the system and the desired properties. Afterwards we have to find algorithms to check whether the properties hold in the system. In many cases we can model the system as a finite automaton with a suitable storage mechanism, e.g., functional programs with recursive calls can be modeled as automata with a stack (or pushdown). Here, we consider automata with two variations of stacks and queues: 1. Partially lossy queues and stacks, which are allowed to forget some specified parts of their contents at any time. We are able to model unreliable systems with such memories. 2. Distributed queues and stacks, i.e., multiple such memories with a special synchronization in between. Often we can check the properties of our models by solving the reachability and recurrent reachability problems in our automata models. It is well-known that the decidability of these problems highly depends on the concrete data type of our automata’s memory. Both problems can be solved in polynomial time for automata with one stack. In contrast, these problems are undecidable if we attach a queue or at least two stacks to our automata. In some special cases we are still able to verify such systems. So, we will consider only special automata with multiple stacks - so-called asynchronous pushdown automata. These are multiple (local) automata each having one stack. Whenever these automata try to write something into at least one stack, we require a read action on these stacks right before these actions. We will see that the (recurrent) reachability problem is decidable for such asynchronous pushdown automata in polynomial time. We can also semi-decide the reachability problem of our queue automata by exploration of the configration space. To this end, we can join multiple consecutive transitions to so-called meta-transformations and simulate them at once. Here, we study meta-transformations alternating between writing words from a given regular language into the queues and reading words from another regular language from the queues. We will see that such metatransformations can be applied in polynomial time. To show this result we first study some algebraic properties of our stacks and queues.Ein wichtiges Forschungsthema in der Informatik ist die Verifikation, d.h., die Analyse von Systemen bezüglich ihrer Korrektheit. Diese Analyse erfolgt in zwei Schritten: Zuerst müssen wir das System und die gewünschten Eigenschaften formalisieren. Anschließend benötigen wir Algorithmen zum Testen, ob das System die Eigenschaften erfüllt. Oftmals können wir das Systemals endlichen Automaten mit geeignetem Speichermechanismus modellieren, z.B. rekursive Programme sind im Wesentlichen Automaten mit einem Stack. Hier betrachten wir Automaten mit zwei Varianten von Stacks und Queues: 1. Partiell vergessliche Stacks und Queues, welche bestimmte Teile ihrer Inhalte jederzeit vergessen können. Diese können für unzuverlässige Systeme verwendet werden. 2. Verteilte Stacks und Queues, d.h., mehrere Stacks und Queues mit vordefinierter Synchronisierung. Häufig lassen sich die Eigenschaften unserer Modelle mithilfe des (wiederholten) Erreichbarkeitsproblems in unseren Automaten lösen. Dabei ist bekannt, dass die Entscheidbarkeit dieser Probleme oftmals stark vom konkreten Datentyp des Speichers abhängt. Beide Probleme können für Automaten mit einem Stack in Polynomialzeit gelöst werden. Sie sind jedoch unentscheidbar, wenn wir Automaten mit einer Queue oder zwei Stacks betrachten. In bestimmten Spezialfällen sind aber dennoch in der Lage diese Systeme zu verifizieren. So können wir beispielsweise bestimmte Automaten mit mehreren Stacks betrachten - so genannte Asynchrone Kellerautomaten. Diese bestehen aus mehreren (lokalen) Automaten mit jeweils einem Stack. Wann immer diese Automaten etwas in mind. einen Stack schreiben, müssen sie unmittelbar zuvor von diesen Stacks etwas lesen. Das (wiederholte) Erreichbarkeitsproblem ist in asynchronen Kellerautomaten in Polynomialzeit entscheidbar. Wir können zudem das Erreichbarkeitsproblem von Queueautomaten durch Exploration des Konfigurationsraums semi-entscheiden. Hierzu können wir mehrere aufeinanderfolgende Transitionen zu so genannten Meta-Transformationen zusammenfassen und diese in einem Schritt simulieren. Hier betrachten wir Meta-Transformationen, die zwischen dem Lesen und Schreiben von Wörtern aus zwei gegebenen regulären Sprachen alternieren. Diese Meta-Transformationen können in Polynomialzeit ausgeführt werden. Für dieses Ergebnis müssen wir jedoch zunächst verschiedene algebraische Eigenschaften der Queues betrachten

Reachability problems on reliable and lossy queue automata

We study the reachability problem for queue automata and lossy queue automata. Concretely, we consider the set of queue contents which are forwards resp. backwards reachable from a given set of queue contents. Here, we prove the preservation of regularity if the queue automaton loops through some special sets of transformation sequences. This is a generalization of the results by Boigelot et al. and Abdulla et al. regarding queue automata looping through a single sequence of transformations. We also prove that our construction is possible in polynomial time

Rational, recognizable, and aperiodic sets in the partially lossy queue monoid

Partially lossy queue monoids (or plq monoids) model the behavior of queues that can forget arbitrary parts of their content. While many decision problems on recognizable subsets in the plq monoid are decidable, most of them are undecidable if the sets are rational. In particular, in this monoid the classes of rational and recognizable subsets do not coincide. By restricting multiplication and iteration in the construction of rational sets and by allowing complementation we obtain precisely the class of recognizable sets. From these special rational expressions we can obtain an MSO logic describing the recognizable subsets. Moreover, we provide similar results for the class of aperiodic subsets in the plq monoid

The Cayley-graph of the queue monoid: logic and decidability

We investigate the decidability of logical aspects of graphs that arise as Cayley-graphs of the so-called queue monoids. These monoids model the behavior of the classical (reliable) fifo-queues. We answer a question raised by Huschenbett, Kuske, and Zetzsche and prove the decidability of the first-order theory of these graphs with the help of an - at least for the authors - new combination of the well-known method from Ferrante and Rackoff and an automata-based approach. On the other hand, we prove that the monadic second-order of the queue monoid's Cayley-graph is undecidable

The inclusion structure of partially lossy queue monoids and their trace submonoids

We model the behavior of a lossy fifo-queue as a monoid of transformations that are induced by sequences of writing and reading. To have a common model for reliable and lossy queues, we split the alphabet of the queue into two parts: the forgettable letters and the letters that are transmitted reliably. We describe this monoid by means of a confluent and terminating semi-Thue system and then study some of the monoid’s algebraic properties. In particular, we characterize completely when one such monoid can be embedded into another as well as which trace monoids occur as submonoids. Surprisingly, these are precisely those trace monoids that embed into the direct product of two free monoids – which gives a partial answer to a question raised by Diekert et al. at STACS 1995

EVS Trend File 1981-2017 – Sensitive Dataset

The European Values Study is a large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research program on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics, and society. Repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries, the survey provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of citizens all over Europe. The EVS Trend File 1981-2017 is constructed from the five EVS waves and covers almost 40 years. In altogether 160 surveys, more than 224.000 respondents from 48 countries/regions were interviewed. It is based on the updated data of the EVS Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (v.3.1.0) and the current EVS 2017 Integrated Dataset (v.5.0.0). For the EVS Trend File, a Restricted-Use File (ZA7504) is available in addition to the (factually anonymised) Scientific-Use File (ZA7503). The EVS Trend File – Sensitive Dataset (ZA7504) is provided as an add-on file. In addition to a small set of admin and protocol variables needed to merge with the SUF data, the Sensitive Dataset contains the following variables that could not be included in the scientific-use file due to their sensitive nature: W005_3 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) - spouse/partner EVS 2008W005_3_01 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO08) - spouse/partner EVS 2017W005_4 Job profession/industry (4-digit ISCO88) - spouse/partner EVS 2008X035_3 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) – respondent EVS 1999, EVS 2008 X035_3_01 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO08) - respondent EVS 2017X035_4 Job profession/industry (4-digit ISCO88) – respondent EVS 1999, EVS 2008 x048c_n3 Region where the interview was conducted (NUTS-3): NUTS version 2006 EVS 2008X048J_N3 Region where the interview was conducted (NUTS-3): NUTS version 2016 EVS 2017X049 Size of town (8 categories) EVS 2008, EVS 2017 Detailed information on the anonymization process in the EVS Trend File is provided in the EVS Trend File Variable Report